Conceptual impressions surrounding this post are yet to be
substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, or
network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.
Energy
fields have no borders other than those we attribute to them by means of
observation and experience. All energy fields have the potential to expand
beyond the symbolic constraints imposed upon them by means of selective observation.
Design
establishes the symbolic link between fields. Only certain
impressions seem to entice us towards inquiry and discovery, in reference to
humanity, coherent resonance appears to
be a characteristic of the intuition due to its capability to re-cognize and
integrate mental and emotional impressions into a cohesive unit and/or POV.
References:
The
intuition appears to function as a kind of
“higher mind” often affiliated with the concept of wisdom. The intuition
seems to synthesize a wide variety of human physical, mental, emotional and
spiritual impressions and observations into what has been described as our
“feelings”. It is upon this postulate that the following observations are
based.
Energy has been characterized and measured as being both potential and kinetic in quality.
Potential energy/conceptual = references made between vibratory correspondences. Potential energy infers change.
Kinetic energy/linear = references made between an observer and a frame of reference/s, i.e. context. Kinetic energy describes change.
Fields of energy overlap, intersect and become repeatedly configured and reconfigured by means of the context in which they are observed. Fields of energy harbor a wide variety of distinguishable characteristics. Each field is imprinted with a quality of its own based upon observation.
Every field of energy appears to embrace certain attributes/qualifications that distinguish it from others. These distinctions may be measured and made observable or not. These distinctions may be intuitively felt and/or made symbolically apparent through analogy, metaphor or allegory. By means of repetition these correspondences contribute to the evolution of a language personally designed and created by the observer. It is upon these same observations/imprints appearing in the form of feelings/impressions that the mind becomes sensitized. These impressions are symbolic in nature, conceptual in origin and at times are found to be measurable by virtue of their vibratory presence.
Design is the language of awareness. Design embraces the unspoken word. Observation describes and re-presents a set of “ideas” that when observed within a certain context, affords a degree of congruency to a specific field of consciousness.
Ideas are generated
around a concept, i.e. an intangible impression or feeling that harbors both meaning and purpose. Ideas (images) stemming from the imagination are synthetic reflections/impressions originating from a central core/attendance.
Forms/patterns are generated in reference to the context in which they are observed. Ideas may or may not become substantiated, i.e. materialized, dependent upon observable and unobservable circumstances. Fulfillment is based upon an idea's response to kinetic and potential energy re-sources consciously and subconsciously integrated by correspondence. Design leads these impressions out of the darkness and into the light. This describes a journey of symbolic importance
Forms/patterns are generated in reference to the context in which they are observed. Ideas may or may not become substantiated, i.e. materialized, dependent upon observable and unobservable circumstances. Fulfillment is based upon an idea's response to kinetic and potential energy re-sources consciously and subconsciously integrated by correspondence. Design leads these impressions out of the darkness and into the light. This describes a journey of symbolic importance
The physical realm re-presents a unique field/form of energy where patterns appear to “materialize” by virtue of vibration, frequency and corresponding resonance. The strength of a field can be measured by means of its correspondences, i.e. the linking of every expression of energy (idea) into a stable/balanced and re-cognizable pattern through coherent resonance.
vibration: an instance of vibrating:• Physics an oscillation of the parts of a fluid or an elastic solid whose equilibrium has been disturbed, or of an electromagnetic wave. • (vibrations) informal a person's emotional state, the atmosphere of a place, or the associations of an object, as communicated to and felt by others.
frequency: (plural frequencies) 1 the rate at which something occurs or is repeated over a particular period of time or in a given sample:• the fact of being frequent or happening often. • Statistics the ratio of the number of actual to possible occurrences of an event. • Statistics the (relative) number of times something occurs in a given sample. 2 the rate at which a vibration occurs that constitutes a wave, either in a material (as in sound waves), or in an electromagnetic field (as in radio waves and light), usually measured per second. (Symbol: f or ν) • the particular waveband at which a radio station or other system broadcasts or transmits signals.
corresponding: analogous or equivalent in character, form, or function; comparable:
resonance: 1 the quality in a sound of being deep, full, and reverberating:. • the ability to evoke or suggest images, memories, and emotions: 2 Physics the reinforcement or prolongation of sound by reflection from a surface or by the synchronous vibration of a neighboring object. 3 the condition in which an electric circuit or device produces the largest possible response to an applied oscillating signal, especially when its inductive and its capacitative reactances are balanced. • Mechanics the condition in which an object or system is subjected to an oscillating force having a frequency close to its own natural frequency. 4 Astronomy the occurrence of a simple ratio between the periods of revolution of two bodies about a single primary. 5 Chemistry the state attributed to certain molecules of having a structure that cannot adequately be represented by a single structural formula but is a composite of two or more structures of higher energy. 6 Physics a short-lived subatomic particle that is an excited state of a more stable particle.
Water becomes ice due to the context (field) in which its agency (molecules) corresponds. Together they create a formation of energy created in response to the context/situation/circumstance in which they are observed. Lower temperatures change the molecular context leading to the creation of a solid, e.g. ice. High temperatures lead to the emergence of a vapor or plasma.
Agencies of comparable vibration are attracted to each other by means of correspondence and as result achieve a coherency through resonance. All agents retain neutrality until observed. This situation appears to be the context from which the concept of duality emerges for purposes of expansion through dynamic energy transformation, i.e. e-motion.
coherence: 1 the quality of being logical and consistent: 2 the quality of forming a unified whole:
Coherency by means of resonance, participates in the creation of a momentary dynamic between "states of energy". This dynamic state is displayed in the form of a field, a changing coalescence, an impermanent presence, or quantified condition. Energy is difficult to harness and therefore can only be best described symbolically by means of the context in which it is perceived and/or observed.
Water describes itself kinetically by what it does when observed, perceived and/or sensed. Energy takes the form of water by means of coherent resonance between atoms/molecules and is symbolically described by means of the context in which it is observed. Differences between states of energy appear to be separated and characterized by means of referential contrast.
Due to the nature of energy, change can be described and/or defined kinetically. One might describe this phenomenon as "energy observed within its own conceptual moment." What we perceive and measure as a field is merely the best way to symbolically describe/label this perpetually changing phenomenon.
coherence: 1 the quality of being logical and consistent: 2 the quality of forming a unified whole:
Coherency by means of resonance, participates in the creation of a momentary dynamic between "states of energy". This dynamic state is displayed in the form of a field, a changing coalescence, an impermanent presence, or quantified condition. Energy is difficult to harness and therefore can only be best described symbolically by means of the context in which it is perceived and/or observed.
Due to the nature of energy, change can be described and/or defined kinetically. One might describe this phenomenon as "energy observed within its own conceptual moment." What we perceive and measure as a field is merely the best way to symbolically describe/label this perpetually changing phenomenon.
dynamic 1 (of a process or system) characterized by constant change, activity, or progress: • Physics relating to forces producing motion. Often contrasted with static.• Linguistics (of a verb) expressing an action, activity, event, or process. 2 (of a person) positive in attitude and full of energy and new ideas: noun 1 a force that stimulates change or progress within a system or process:
* * *
The text provided invites a nuanced exploration of energy, observation, and perception through the lenses of psychology, semiotics, metaphysics, and quantum geometry. It weaves together themes from these disciplines, offering a rich tapestry that could be further developed to clarify and enrich its academic insights. Below is a refined and expanded version of the original text, incorporating these disciplines in a more systematic and analytical manner.
The Symbolic Nature of Energy Fields and Observation Energy fields, inherently formless and fluid, do not possess intrinsic borders. These boundaries are instead attributed to them through human observation, experience, and conceptual framing. This view suggests that energy exists as an open, dynamic field with infinite potential for expansion, yet it is constrained by the symbolic, perceptual frameworks we impose upon it. In this regard, fields of energy, whether conceptual, emotional, or physical, can only be understood within the context of the observer's selective perception. The field's qualities—its intensity, pattern, or resonance—are shaped by the act of observation itself, pointing to the subjectivity inherent in any form of perception. This aligns with key principles in quantum mechanics, where the observer's role in collapsing the wave function is fundamental. Energy, thus, is not static but is continually redefined through the lens of observation. The boundary of the energy field becomes a semiotic act—signifying the way in which we codify and categorize experiences into forms that are intelligible to the mind. The symbolic links between fields are established through the act of design—design being understood not simply as aesthetic choice, but as a means of structuring meaning through the mediation of consciousness. Each instance of perception is an act of co-creation, where the energy field is not merely observed but actively constructed by the observer's cognitive faculties.
Intuition and the Role of Coherent Resonance At the heart of this process lies intuition, a psychological and semiotic mechanism often attributed to the "higher mind." This intuition is a form of knowledge that synthesizes disparate impressions—physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual—into a coherent whole. It is through this synthesis that we arrive at a unitary point of view (POV), which we experience as "feelings" or "emotional responses." In this sense, intuition is not simply an abstract concept but a tangible force in human cognition, linking the symbolic with the embodied. Coherent resonance is a key attribute of this intuition. Resonance, in both the psychological and metaphysical sense, refers to the harmony or congruency between internal states of mind and external phenomena. This coherence is more than a passive reflection; it is an active process by which the mind "re-cognizes" the field of experience, integrating the emotional and cognitive impressions into a structured perception of reality. From a semiotic perspective, intuition is how symbols (feelings, ideas, images) are made meaningful within a given context.
Energy and its Dual Nature: Potential and Kinetic Energy, as traditionally described in physics, exists in two primary forms: potential and kinetic. However, from a semiotic and metaphysical viewpoint, these forms can be further understood as conceptual and linear. Potential energy, conceptual in nature, is the energy of possibility. It is the latent potential inherent in the vibratory correspondences between fields, signifying change yet to come. Potential energy can be understood as symbolic energy—it is the latent possibility that informs future action, the pre-conscious field from which intuitive impressions arise. Kinetic energy, conversely, is the energy of actualized movement. It manifests in the relationship between an observer and the observed context. The observer’s engagement with the field induces change, which is experienced as movement, transformation, or action. This aligns with the metaphysical principle that change itself is a process of becoming, a dynamic interplay of forces that transcend static observation. It is kinetic energy that is perceived as the manifestation of the potential within a field, bringing it into observable existence.
The Overlap and Intersection of Energy FieldsEnergy fields do not exist in isolation; rather, they overlap, intersect, and coalesce into new configurations as they are observed. These overlapping fields are marked by distinct characteristics, imprinted through the process of observation. Just as distinct patterns emerge within physical fields, so too do psychological or emotional fields reflect a set of coherent patterns that can be symbolically articulated. The semiotic process of recognizing these patterns involves the imposition of conceptual categories that shape the experience into a legible structure. In the language of semiotics, each energy field carries a set of signs—distinctive characteristics or "qualifications" that signify states of being. These may not always be measurable in empirical terms, but they can be felt intuitively or symbolically expressed through metaphor or allegory. The process of re-cognition allows the mind to develop a personal "language" through which to interact with the world. This personal language, grounded in repetition and resonance, allows for the evolution of meaning over time.
Design as the Language of Awareness The concept of design transcends its conventional understanding in the visual or architectural sense. In this framework, design represents the language of awareness—an intuitive structuring of the energy fields that comprise our reality. Design is the medium through which energy, through its various forms (potential and kinetic), is interpreted and made meaningful. It is the semiotic act of arranging symbols (ideas, feelings, images) into a form that brings coherence to an otherwise chaotic field of experience. In this way, design is the unspoken language that articulates the relationship between the mind and the field. It represents the symbolic link between our inner states and the external world, a bridge between the tangible and intangible, the known and the unknown. The process of design reflects an ongoing interplay between observation and interpretation, revealing how consciousness, through its various modes of perception, organizes the world into a coherent, symbolic framework.
The Emergence of Materiality and the Symbolic Realm Energy, through the principles of resonance and vibration, can be seen to materialize in the physical realm. The example of water transforming into ice or vapor demonstrates how energy is shaped by the field in which it is observed. In this instance, water’s transformation is a result of coherent resonance between molecular agencies, which adapt to the changes in temperature. This process reflects a broader metaphysical principle: energy is not static but is in a constant state of flux, perpetually interacting with its field of context to produce new forms and expressions. The principle of duality, as illustrated by water’s different states, emerges through this dynamic. At the level of quantum geometry, the apparent transition between solid, liquid, and gas reflects the fundamental nature of energy to shift states depending on the vibratory context. Here, duality is not an intrinsic feature of the energy field itself, but a construct that emerges from the observation and interaction of the energy with the observer. This duality—manifest in the contrast between states of energy—serves as the foundation for dynamic transformation, a process that may be thought of as emotional or energetic "movement" (e-motion).
The Symbolic Role of the Observer The observer plays a crucial role in the emergence of energy’s dynamic state. Just as a physicist’s measurement collapses a wave function, the observer’s perception collapses the potentiality of energy into a coherent form, which can then be symbolically described. This interaction between observer and energy reflects the semiotic process of meaning-making, wherein the observer’s mind filters, interprets, and re-presents the field of energy through the symbolic lens of language and representation. The observer’s mind, using intuition, perceives and organizes these impressions into cohesive "ideas" that serve as representations of the underlying energetic phenomena. These ideas, in turn, give rise to further impressions, which accumulate to form a coherent symbolic system. This system enables the observer to navigate and understand the ever-changing dynamics of energy fields.
Conclusion In summary, the text presents an intricate view of energy as both a physical and metaphysical phenomenon, one that is deeply entwined with the processes of perception, observation, and symbolic representation. Energy fields, governed by potential and kinetic principles, do not exist in isolation but are shaped by the observer’s interpretation. Through intuition and the semiotic act of design, these fields become meaningful, offering a dynamic, evolving language of awareness that bridges the intangible and the tangible. In this framework, the observer is both a participant and a creator of the energy field, co-constructing reality through the interaction of perception, resonance, and symbolic meaning.
This expanded and refined version integrates a multi-disciplinary perspective, emphasizing the interplay between semiotics, psychology, metaphysics, and quantum theory. The discussion of energy as both potential and kinetic aligns with quantum principles, while the notion of intuition and resonance ties into psychological and semiotic theories of perception. The focus on design as a symbolic language allows for a synthesis of these themes, presenting a holistic view of the observer's role in constructing reality.
The Symbolic Nature of Energy Fields and Observation Energy fields, inherently formless and fluid, do not possess intrinsic borders. These boundaries are instead attributed to them through human observation, experience, and conceptual framing. This view suggests that energy exists as an open, dynamic field with infinite potential for expansion, yet it is constrained by the symbolic, perceptual frameworks we impose upon it. In this regard, fields of energy, whether conceptual, emotional, or physical, can only be understood within the context of the observer's selective perception. The field's qualities—its intensity, pattern, or resonance—are shaped by the act of observation itself, pointing to the subjectivity inherent in any form of perception. This aligns with key principles in quantum mechanics, where the observer's role in collapsing the wave function is fundamental. Energy, thus, is not static but is continually redefined through the lens of observation. The boundary of the energy field becomes a semiotic act—signifying the way in which we codify and categorize experiences into forms that are intelligible to the mind. The symbolic links between fields are established through the act of design—design being understood not simply as aesthetic choice, but as a means of structuring meaning through the mediation of consciousness. Each instance of perception is an act of co-creation, where the energy field is not merely observed but actively constructed by the observer's cognitive faculties.
Intuition and the Role of Coherent Resonance At the heart of this process lies intuition, a psychological and semiotic mechanism often attributed to the "higher mind." This intuition is a form of knowledge that synthesizes disparate impressions—physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual—into a coherent whole. It is through this synthesis that we arrive at a unitary point of view (POV), which we experience as "feelings" or "emotional responses." In this sense, intuition is not simply an abstract concept but a tangible force in human cognition, linking the symbolic with the embodied. Coherent resonance is a key attribute of this intuition. Resonance, in both the psychological and metaphysical sense, refers to the harmony or congruency between internal states of mind and external phenomena. This coherence is more than a passive reflection; it is an active process by which the mind "re-cognizes" the field of experience, integrating the emotional and cognitive impressions into a structured perception of reality. From a semiotic perspective, intuition is how symbols (feelings, ideas, images) are made meaningful within a given context.
Energy and its Dual Nature: Potential and Kinetic Energy, as traditionally described in physics, exists in two primary forms: potential and kinetic. However, from a semiotic and metaphysical viewpoint, these forms can be further understood as conceptual and linear. Potential energy, conceptual in nature, is the energy of possibility. It is the latent potential inherent in the vibratory correspondences between fields, signifying change yet to come. Potential energy can be understood as symbolic energy—it is the latent possibility that informs future action, the pre-conscious field from which intuitive impressions arise. Kinetic energy, conversely, is the energy of actualized movement. It manifests in the relationship between an observer and the observed context. The observer’s engagement with the field induces change, which is experienced as movement, transformation, or action. This aligns with the metaphysical principle that change itself is a process of becoming, a dynamic interplay of forces that transcend static observation. It is kinetic energy that is perceived as the manifestation of the potential within a field, bringing it into observable existence.
The Overlap and Intersection of Energy FieldsEnergy fields do not exist in isolation; rather, they overlap, intersect, and coalesce into new configurations as they are observed. These overlapping fields are marked by distinct characteristics, imprinted through the process of observation. Just as distinct patterns emerge within physical fields, so too do psychological or emotional fields reflect a set of coherent patterns that can be symbolically articulated. The semiotic process of recognizing these patterns involves the imposition of conceptual categories that shape the experience into a legible structure. In the language of semiotics, each energy field carries a set of signs—distinctive characteristics or "qualifications" that signify states of being. These may not always be measurable in empirical terms, but they can be felt intuitively or symbolically expressed through metaphor or allegory. The process of re-cognition allows the mind to develop a personal "language" through which to interact with the world. This personal language, grounded in repetition and resonance, allows for the evolution of meaning over time.
Design as the Language of Awareness The concept of design transcends its conventional understanding in the visual or architectural sense. In this framework, design represents the language of awareness—an intuitive structuring of the energy fields that comprise our reality. Design is the medium through which energy, through its various forms (potential and kinetic), is interpreted and made meaningful. It is the semiotic act of arranging symbols (ideas, feelings, images) into a form that brings coherence to an otherwise chaotic field of experience. In this way, design is the unspoken language that articulates the relationship between the mind and the field. It represents the symbolic link between our inner states and the external world, a bridge between the tangible and intangible, the known and the unknown. The process of design reflects an ongoing interplay between observation and interpretation, revealing how consciousness, through its various modes of perception, organizes the world into a coherent, symbolic framework.
The Emergence of Materiality and the Symbolic Realm Energy, through the principles of resonance and vibration, can be seen to materialize in the physical realm. The example of water transforming into ice or vapor demonstrates how energy is shaped by the field in which it is observed. In this instance, water’s transformation is a result of coherent resonance between molecular agencies, which adapt to the changes in temperature. This process reflects a broader metaphysical principle: energy is not static but is in a constant state of flux, perpetually interacting with its field of context to produce new forms and expressions. The principle of duality, as illustrated by water’s different states, emerges through this dynamic. At the level of quantum geometry, the apparent transition between solid, liquid, and gas reflects the fundamental nature of energy to shift states depending on the vibratory context. Here, duality is not an intrinsic feature of the energy field itself, but a construct that emerges from the observation and interaction of the energy with the observer. This duality—manifest in the contrast between states of energy—serves as the foundation for dynamic transformation, a process that may be thought of as emotional or energetic "movement" (e-motion).
The Symbolic Role of the Observer The observer plays a crucial role in the emergence of energy’s dynamic state. Just as a physicist’s measurement collapses a wave function, the observer’s perception collapses the potentiality of energy into a coherent form, which can then be symbolically described. This interaction between observer and energy reflects the semiotic process of meaning-making, wherein the observer’s mind filters, interprets, and re-presents the field of energy through the symbolic lens of language and representation. The observer’s mind, using intuition, perceives and organizes these impressions into cohesive "ideas" that serve as representations of the underlying energetic phenomena. These ideas, in turn, give rise to further impressions, which accumulate to form a coherent symbolic system. This system enables the observer to navigate and understand the ever-changing dynamics of energy fields.
Conclusion In summary, the text presents an intricate view of energy as both a physical and metaphysical phenomenon, one that is deeply entwined with the processes of perception, observation, and symbolic representation. Energy fields, governed by potential and kinetic principles, do not exist in isolation but are shaped by the observer’s interpretation. Through intuition and the semiotic act of design, these fields become meaningful, offering a dynamic, evolving language of awareness that bridges the intangible and the tangible. In this framework, the observer is both a participant and a creator of the energy field, co-constructing reality through the interaction of perception, resonance, and symbolic meaning.
This expanded and refined version integrates a multi-disciplinary perspective, emphasizing the interplay between semiotics, psychology, metaphysics, and quantum theory. The discussion of energy as both potential and kinetic aligns with quantum principles, while the notion of intuition and resonance ties into psychological and semiotic theories of perception. The focus on design as a symbolic language allows for a synthesis of these themes, presenting a holistic view of the observer's role in constructing reality.
* * *
THE CONCEPT OF REPRESENTATIVE AGENCY
representative
• containing
typical examples of many or all types
3 serving as a portrayal or symbol of something
• (of
art) representational
4 Philosophy of or relating to mental
representation.
agency
1 [often
with adj. ] a business or organization established to provide a particular
service, typically one that involves organizing
transactions between two other parties
• a
department or body providing a specific service for a government or similar
organization
2 action or intervention, esp. such as to produce a
particular effect
• a thing or person that acts to produce a particular
result
Design creates the
symbolic link between fields of energy, light and information. These links are made
apparent/conscious through coherent resonance.
Three-dimensional space and linear time is fundamentally material in
its nature/context. Humanity shares in this presence/dimension in addition to
three other integrated agencies (fields) described as being mental, emotional
and spiritual in character and quality.
“Perception shapes experience. These are physical examples, but we can say something similar about our everyday psychological experiences too. We become so fixed in our mindsets about what is true, as if our opinions are absolute facts, but like colour and time, they are rarely absolute facts. Often, they are just opinions – either our own or someone else’s.”
* * *
Unlike
the field of energy transformation (physical/kinetic), these intangible provinces (potential) add a
unique quality to the character of human consciousness. Upon observation these intangible fields/domains are highly sensitive, receptive and responsive. Together they embrace and bring focus to what we believe we know, feel and determine as being real. They are symbolic in character and function, ideas adding to the construct of a particular field of consciousness.
Reality truly is a matter of choice.
intangible: unable to be touched or
grasped; not having physical presence
• difficult or impossible to define or understand; vague and abstract
• (of
an asset or benefit) not constituting or represented by
a physical object and of a value not precisely measurable
Symbolically
speaking the mind, the body, our emotions and the human spirit bring
fulfillment to a greater understanding, perception and projection of our own
personal and natural state of being.
Together
and over time, higher interpretations/reflections of one’s identity (field)
mingles with the hardcore physical attributes of 3D space/time. Relationships
between these four attributes, i.e. physical, mental, emotional, spiritual,
create an identifiable arrangement of energy patterns/links that influence the
contexts in which events are observed and situations experienced. This
construct has become the ground upon which all belief systems are formed and
choices made.
All fields of energy adapt to the context in which they are observed. These impressions are designed to maintain a harmonic balance between options/choices/directives. Every identifiable, i.e. design-ated, energy field/state retains its identity/balance by means of observation and response (input and output). These responses likewise become the source/s of change made amidst a series of symbolic impressions revealed in the moment.
* * *
Neural Correlates of Consciousness Meet the Theory of Identity
1Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy and Arts, University of West Bohemia, Pilsen, Czechia
2The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy, Prague, Czechia
“The theory of identity fits the bill nicely. It is a simple and elegant metaphysical explanation of the mind-brain connection. Why do the neural states and states of consciousness correlate? Because they are one and the same thing. Claiming the identity of phenomenal and neural states enables one to describe their nature simultaneously. Examples from the history of science show that identifying two phenomena which were previously thought to be distinct brings rapid advances in the understanding of both.”
* * *
All fields of energy adapt to the context in which they are observed. These impressions are designed to maintain a harmonic balance between options/choices/directives. Every identifiable, i.e. design-ated, energy field/state retains its identity/balance by means of observation and response (input and output). These responses likewise become the source/s of change made amidst a series of symbolic impressions revealed in the moment.
All fields of energy adapt to/within the context they are observed solely in order to maintain balance from within. Every identifiable, i.e. designated, field of energy retains its symbolic identity by means of focused observation.
A
field’s identity/sustainability is acquired, denigrated and/or dispersed in
response to the process of coherent resonance.
Fields
of energy interpenetrate each other while encountering a certain degree of innate tumultuousness and influence within their combined sphere of influence.
Fields of energy serve as unique sources for change. Fields of energy are in perpetual motion (e-motion) mixing and matching while becoming causal forces in their own right or persuasion. Every field of energy encounters a certain a degree of observable tumultuousness until its context is forcibly stabilized or controlled.
Correspondences
(energy sharing) between the observer and the observed might be construed
as an issue of “magnitude”. As demonstrated
by two tuning forks, a note can freely sound within a field of greater or lesser magnitude, but resonate only with agents that share a common chord.
chord: a group of (typically three or more)
notes sounded together, as a basis of harmony
At
times patterns, i.e. fields of energy, appear to be consistent yet remain forever
vulnerable whenever a three dimensional POV is engaged. This is the dimension
of certain realizations, where every silent effort towards growth and expansion
by virtue of the intuition and imagination, can be experienced and made
manifest.
Patterns
of energy are created by means of induction. Induction describes a particular
type of energy in motion and is fundamental to understanding the concept of
attraction.
induce: 1 succeed
in persuading or influencing (someone) to do
something 2 bring
about or give rise to:
• produce (an electric charge or current or a
magnetic state) by induction.
* * *
Your text dives into a complex and nuanced view of energy fields, observation, and change. Here’s a summary that captures the essence of your points:
1. Adaptive Energy Fields: Energy fields adapt to the context in which they are observed. Their identity and balance are upheld through observation and response, creating a feedback loop of energy in motion as both reflection and refraction.
reflection: sending back, mirroring, image, likeness, display, demonstration, manifestation, expression, proof, evidence, thought, consideration, contemplation, meditation, deliberation, cognition, musing, opinion, thought, view, viewpoint, belief, feeling, impression, conclusion, judgement, assessment, observation, statement.
refraction: the fact or phenomenon of light, radio waves, etc. being deflected in passing obliquely through the interface between one medium and another, or through a medium of varying density, change in direction or propagation of any wave as a result of its traveling at different speeds at different points along the wave front.
2. Observation and Balance: Every identifiable field of energy in motion retains its own symbolic identity by virtue of observation. Change and sustainability of these fields is retained by means of interaction and coherence.
3. Interpenetration and Influence: Energy fields interpenetrate each other, leading to a dynamic interplay of influence within their shared space and time.
4. Patterns and Perspectives: Patterns of energy in motion (ideas) emerging from within every field (concept) is shaped, interpreted and defined by the observer's own sense of awareness while engaged in the process of observation. Observation leads to both tangible and intangible interpretations, correspondences and change.
5. Perpetual Motion and Change: Energy fields are in constant motion, interacting and influencing each other. They experience tumultuousness until their contexts are controlled and made "stable" by virtue of observation. Observation reframes time and can thereby stabilize energy, light and information within a timeframe conducive to proper observation and response. In this sense, an observer can "stop time" merely through the act of observation.
6. Magnitude and Resonance: Correspondences made between an observer and what is being observed are influenced by magnitude. Similar to the relationship between two tuning forks vibrating the same note at a different octave, a common resonance emerges between them by virtue of their coherence.
magnitude: immensity, vastness, expansiveness, greatness, importance, significance, weight, moment, consequence, notability, greatness, distinction, eminence, intensity, power, measure, size, importance, amplitude, capacity, degree, brightness, brilliance, radiance, luminosity.
7. Dimensional Vulnerability: Certain patterns of energy may seem consistent, important and at times appropriate, yet still can become vulnerable when observed from a different perspective. Growth and expansion are influenced by the relationship between the intuition and the imagination along with the thought and feeling of the moment.
8. Induction and Attraction: Energy patterns are created through induction, a fundamental process that acts in accordance with attraction and the free movement of energy.
induction: the process or action of bringing about or giving rise to something, the production of facts to prove a general statement, the production of an electric or magnetic state by the proximity (without contact) of an electrified magnetized body, the production of an electric current in a conductor by varying the magnetic field applied to the conductor.
In essence, your text explores how energy fields are in constant flux and interaction, shaped by observation, resonance, and context. The interplay of these fields, along with the observer’s perspective, influences their patterns and changes.
The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
* * *
COHERENT RESONANCE
AND REPRESENTATIVE AGENCY
* * *
“Difference, being of the nature of relationship, is not located in time or space.”
* * *
The concept of a field of energy is relative. The idea of there being a unified field is somewhat misleading. Fields of energy can be both similar and dissimilar based upon POV. Identities founded upon potential energy (concepts) are expected to change during the process towards substantiation.
Ideas founded upon abductive thinking demand that all options/opportunities/choices/alternatives be considered in pursuit of sustainability. In other words, designs are to be "created in the light of balance".
Note: Sustainability is a more expansive and inclusive interpretation of survival. Survival is another word for sustainability when viewed from a lower level of consciousness and dimension. In reference to time: survival is considered short term thinking, sustainability long term. Survival is based upon sustainability and if appropriately designed, a natural and simple outcome in support of sustainability.
survival: the state or fact of continuing to live or exist, typically in spite of an accident, ordeal, or difficult circumstances: PHRASES survival of the fittest Biology the continued existence of organisms which are best adapted to their environment, with the extinction of others, as a concept in the Darwinian theory of evolution. Compare with natural selection.
sustainability: the ability to be maintained at a certain rate or level: • avoidance of the depletion of natural resources in order to maintain an ecological balance:
* * *
The text touches upon profound metaphysical, semiotic, and psychological themes, while also engaging with some aspects of quantum thought and geometry. To refine and expand upon these ideas, I will incorporate relevant perspectives from these disciplines in an academic tone, focusing on their interrelation and the broader implications of concepts like energy fields, sustainability, and consciousness. I will also reframe the text with more clarity and depth, ensuring it aligns with the intricate nature of the subject matter.
Refined and Expanded Text:
The notion of a field of energy is inherently relative, and as such, cannot be fully understood outside of the perspective (POV) from which it is observed. This relativity challenges the traditional concept of a unified field, which may be somewhat misleading. From a metaphysical standpoint, energy fields are not monolithic but rather exist as a multiplicity of potentialities that manifest differently depending on the observer's positioning within the system. The unified field in this sense could be viewed as an emergent property or an idealized abstraction that does not entirely reflect the dynamic complexity of energy fields in their full experiential breadth.
Fields of energy, like concepts themselves, are mutable—both similar and dissimilar—depending on the angle of perception and interaction. In this context, identities grounded in potential energy, whether they refer to abstract concepts or embodied forms, are in a constant state of flux as they move through the process of substantiation—a process which demands transformation as potential gives way to actuality. This reflects an ontological reality where the actualization of potential is not linear but subject to a dialectical interplay of forces, both seen and unseen.
Abductive Reasoning and Design
In alignment with abductive reasoning, which emphasizes the necessity of considering a wide range of possibilities, the design of systems—whether biological, ecological, or social—demands that all alternatives be explored in the pursuit of sustainability. This includes exploring the interrelations between various forms of energy, identities, and systems, and ensuring that the designed structures not only support the continuation of life but foster a harmonious balance between forces of creation and destruction, order and chaos. Abductive thinking is particularly crucial here, as it invites us to synthesize and explore inference and imagination, navigating the tension between the known and the unknown.
The design process, then, is inherently dynamic, with a focus on crafting solutions that are in "the light of balance"—a concept that resonates deeply with semiotics. In semiotic terms, balance could be seen as the synthesis of signs, where various components (signifiers) are structured to produce meaning (signified) in a way that upholds the integrity of the whole system. Balance, therefore, operates not only on the material plane but also within the semiotic field, reflecting a continuous process of meaning-making that is responsive to its own environment.
Sustainability: Beyond Survival
The term sustainability, as explored in the text, extends beyond the more simplistic notion of survival. While survival may be viewed as a reactive response to immediate threats—a short-term concern governed by the instinctual drives of preservation—sustainability offers a more expansive framework. Sustainability represents an inclusive and forward-thinking interpretation of existence, one that considers long-term viability, harmony, and evolution.
Psychologically, this shift from survival to sustainability reflects a developmental leap in consciousness. Where survival thinking is often rooted in lower levels of awareness, characterized by fear, scarcity, and immediate gratification, sustainability emerges when consciousness expands beyond these confines into a more holistic and interconnected mode of understanding. It suggests a higher-order engagement with time, energy, and existence, wherein the decisions made are not merely for the immediate moment but are crafted with consideration for future consequences.
In quantum geometry, this can be seen as an expansion from linear to non-linear time, where the concept of "immediacy" is no longer confined to one-dimensional cause and effect. Time in this context is multidimensional, interconnected with potential outcomes that are probabilistic rather than deterministic. As such, sustainability is both a temporal and spatial concept—it demands not only the foresight of future generations but also an awareness of the hidden geometries that underlie the material world, manifesting in both fractals and chaotic systems that reveal deep patterns of interconnection.
In this sense, survival is a subset of sustainability, a lower-dimensional projection of a higher-dimensional ideal. From a metaphysical perspective, survival as a mere biological or short-term goal is not sufficient for the full expression of the system’s potential. Sustainability, therefore, acts as the guiding principle for the continued evolution of life, transcending mere survival by fostering an environment where each component can flourish according to its highest potential, achieving a harmonious equilibrium across time and space.
Interconnectedness and the Design of Systems
When sustainability is properly integrated into the design of systems—be they ecological, social, or technological—it inherently leads to a more stable and coherent outcome, one that is naturally aligned with the long-term flow of universal energy. If the system is "appropriately designed," the results align with the emergent properties of sustainability, such that the system, though complex and multifaceted, operates in an elegant and harmonious manner.
This relationship is akin to the principles of quantum mechanics, where particles do not act independently but rather in a state of entanglement. Similarly, when systems are designed with sustainability in mind, the parts cannot be understood in isolation but only through their relational dynamics with the whole. Just as in quantum fields, where the observer plays a role in shaping the phenomena observed, the design process must account for the observer’s own relationship to the system and the broader context in which it operates.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the fields of energy—both literal and metaphorical—are dynamic, multi-dimensional, and relative. Identity, energy, and potential are in constant flux, and the process of moving from potential to actualization is never fully predictable. Abductive reasoning encourages a holistic consideration of all possibilities, fostering designs that emphasize balance and sustainability. Sustainability, in turn, emerges as a more expansive, long-term framework than survival, aligning with higher states of consciousness and awareness. Through the lens of quantum geometry and semiotics, sustainability becomes a design principle that reflects the interconnectedness of all things and encourages systems that are both harmonious and viable across time and space.
By embracing the interconnectedness of existence and designing systems that account for these hidden relationships, humanity can move toward a more sustainable future—one that is not just about surviving but about thriving in balance with the energy fields that define our world.
The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
* * *
* * *
"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous
Be assured you will not discover all the answers to your inquiries here. Continue to investigate into your role as observer, participator and creator in a design of your own making. Be aware of the by-products and outcomes that surround your every choice and decision.
Edited: 09.17.2020, 04.11.2021, 11.01.2021, 03.15.2022, 03.18.2022, 03.25.2022, 10.14.2022, 03.23.2023, 09.11.2024, 07.05.2025
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post as long as author, copyright and URL https://sagariandesignnetwork.blogspot.com is included as the resource and shared on a non-commercial no charge basis. Please note … posts are continually being edited over time. Copyright © 2006 C.G. Garant. All Rights Reserved. (Fair use notice) You are also invited to visit https://designconsciousness.blogspot.com/ and URL https://designmetaphysics.blogspot.com/ and https://www.pinterest.com
No comments:
Post a Comment